TPP: Case study 1

Knowing and responding to your students’ diverse needs.

Contextual Background 

I teach Intro to Graphic Branding and Identity where we explore the cultural relevance of branding within Zeitgeist to an increasingly international cohort. Using western-focused and often old case studies to support teaching points can prop up cultural, academic and linguistic barriers, which can be challenging for our international students, who are predominantly from mainland China. 

Evaluation

For this particular session I focused on Meme culture in an effort to be more culturally relevant and capture the Zeitgeist effectively in a participatory manner – an image is worth a thousand words. Qualitative research on international students in UK higher education suggests that memes operate as boundary objects, fostering belonging while still demanding shared cultural understanding between groups (Zhang, Zhao & Merritt, 2025).

I curated a selection of global, diverse memes to illustrate their brief history, intentions and effectiveness. When demonstrating memes as weapons of communication, I shared the rice bunny meme – a coded message for the #Metoo movement in China, exposing sexual harassment on social media, avoiding censorship. It was an eureka moment in the studio – students responded and engaged very well, recognised and related with this meme. For the first time international students were the ones to contextualise this meme to home students who were not familiar with it. This experience sparked discussion, engagement and helped students overcome language and cultural barriers.

Moving forwards 

Participatory content: Drawing on the inherently participatory nature of memes, I have taken a more critical and reflective approach to my teaching practice, learning materials, and content design in order to foster greater inclusivity, participation, and knowledge retention. Memes have been intentionally incorporated into teaching materials not simply as humorous elements, but as cultural artefacts that support processes of cultural adaptation, identity formation, and shared meaning-making (Zhang, Zhao & Merritt, 2025).

Meme-making has also been formalised as a structured learning activity, enabling students to actively translate concepts into culturally resonant visual–verbal forms. This approach has evidently enhanced student engagement and encouraged reflective discussion during sessions. As digital culture artefacts, memes can operate as effective pedagogical tools that extend beyond humour, supporting comprehension, memory, and participation among diverse learners (Tidy et al., 2024).

Inclusive language: How can we also make language more inclusive and participatory? Studies in academic language pedagogy show that simply simplifying content is not suffice for inclusion – students also need explicit support to access and use the specialised language of the discipline, including professional terminology and jargon (Schleppegrell & O’Hallaron, 2011). We must therefore encourage students to use industry vernacular and jargon more confidently. In addition to supporting students’ use of industry-specific terminology, I consciously address English-specific expressions and idioms used during teaching sessions. Drawing on my experience as a speaker of English as a second language, I recognise that such expressions can be opaque yet are integral to how meaning, tone, and nuance are conveyed in professional contexts. Rather than removing or over-simplifying this language, my approach is to make it explicit: unpacking meanings, contexts, and connotations so that students are empowered to develop their own linguistic competence (Dafouz & Smit, 2022).

This approach is particularly important within the course, where students are required to produce both visual and verbal identities. The latter demands a sensitivity to tone of voice in writing, as language functions not only as a vehicle for clarity but also as a carrier of character, attitude, and intent. While being universally understood is essential, preserving the texture and flavour of language is equally important in enabling students to communicate with confidence and authenticity within creative and professional settings. 

References

Dafouz, E. and Smit, U. (2022) ‘Towards multilingualism in English-medium higher education: a student perspective’, Journal of English-Medium Instruction, 1(1), pp. 29–47. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/358036917_Towards_multilingualism_in_English-medium_higher_education_A_student_perspective ([Accessed 18 February 2026].

Mukherjee, A. & Mukherjee, S., 2025. LOL in the Classroom: Internet Memes as Multimodal Tools for Language Teaching. Journal of Cultural Analysis and Social Change, 10(3), pp.834–845. Available at: https://jcasc.com/index.php/jcasc/article/view/2507 [Accessed 14 February 2026].

Schleppegrell, M.J. and O’Hallaron, C.L. (2011) ‘Teaching academic language in L2 secondary settings’, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, pp. 3–18. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/services/aop-cambridge-core/content/view/7029C531DABBB960E2C352E46FA6575C/S0267190511000067a.pdf [Accessed: 14 February 2026].

Tidy, H., Bolton-King, R. S., Croxton, R., et al. (2024). Enhancing the student learning experience through memes. Science & Justice, 64(3), 280-288.

Teaching reading comprehension and vocabulary using memes (2025) Frontiers in Education. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2025.1467522/full [Accessed: 18 February 2026] 

Zhang, Y., Zhao, S. & Merritt, K. (2025) ‘“Meme‑ing” across cultures: Understanding how non‑EU international students in the UK use internet memes for cultural adaptation and identity’, Behavioral Sciences (Basel), 15(5), p. 693. Available at: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12109331/ [Accessed: 14 February 2026] 

Posted in Theories, Policies and Practices | Leave a comment

TPP: Reflective post 1

Embracing the silence: Introverted learning and the online classroom – a reflection

I started working as an Associate lecturer in 2021 post Covid-19 . Teaching at undergraduate level was a relatively new experience for me which I was looking forward to. Like many courses, we too had to adapt to the new post Covid way of teaching and learning, which meant smaller in-person cohorts but also online sessions. 

I recall thoroughly enjoying the in-person sessions with high levels of engagement, collaboration and active discussion.  Covid provided the unique opportunity of working with smaller groups which brought about a quicker rapport with students and more collaboration in sessions – students and staff got to know each other well and quickly during the in-person 40 credit unit, which met twice weekly. 

This cohort experienced remote teaching at school prior to higher education, their yearning for collaboration and connection was palpable, at times also met with some social anxiety too. It was all new.

Due to space limitations, we had to deliver the 20-credit unit online to the same cohort. We adapted content and workshops to spark discussion, collaboration and ideas online, which was incredibly challenging as we were met with silent microphones and faceless screens. Teaching online was akin to hosting a TV show, with an audience watching from the comfort of their bedrooms, who were expected to respond and interact as they would in an in-person session. 

The staff grew concerned and demoralised as we were unable to recreate the same exciting environment online. We lamented about long pauses, and watching our calls for engagement disappear into the abyss. We associated silence with lack of engagement, which Harris (2022) argues that may not have been quite the case. 

Reading Harris (2022) provided some reassurance in knowing that knowledge was being assimilated in some way, and that the online learning environment may be more favourable to students with different learning styles, allowing them to pursue related side quests without being noticed, which can lead to fruitful outcomes. 

It also made me questions established practices of calling out students’ names soliciting a response for which they may not be ready to deliver – not because they don’t have one, but because they may not be able to articulate it to their expectation in such a short period of time.

During online sessions I did also observe Nielsen’s (2006) ’90-9-1 Rule’, where one to two students would contribute repeatedly (cameras always off!). I associated this behaviour with active engagement with content, assuming the ‘lurkers’ were not engaging. 

Fast forward to the present time, having now taught extensively, designed and delivered content and course curriculum, I have a much broader understanding of designing more inclusive content for diverse learning styles, whilst also being more accepting and encouraging of ‘lurking’ behaviour, resting in the knowledge (and hope) that content is being absorbed on students’ terms and at their pace.

Active participation is not a measure of successful engagement. Moving forward I would like make more time for silence and be more comfortable with one-ended communication.

References

Harris, K. (2022) ‘Embracing the silence: introverted learning and the online classroom’, Spark: UAL Creative Teaching and Learning Journal, Vol. 5 No. 1, 21 November 2022. Available at: https://sparkjournal.arts.ac.uk/index.php/spark/article/view/161 [Accessed: 02 February 2026]

Nielsen, J. (2006) ‘Participation Inequality: The 90-9-1 Rule for Social Features’. Nielsen Norman Group. Available at: https://www.nngroup.com/articles/participation-inequality/ [Accessed: 02 February 2026].

Posted in Theories, Policies and Practices | Leave a comment